Discussion:
Chris Stevens .....
(too old to reply)
Peter L
2006-09-02 17:45:54 UTC
Permalink
who is at present posting as everybody except him/herself, listens too much
to Harvey and not enough to ed.
Consequently, he/she is showing him/herself up to all and sundry :-))
Keep it up Chris, we love it :-))
Mike
The truth will prevail
'Truth'? Not a word Chris is familiar with :-(((((
(Question. Is it Christopher or Christine? I suppose it depends on whether
you are in Y Fronts or Bra and Thong)
Who the hell are you?
Mike
2006-09-02 17:55:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter L
Who the hell are you?
You're new here. Welcome :-))
Peter L
2006-09-02 17:59:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mike
Post by Peter L
Who the hell are you?
You're new here. Welcome :-))
Thank you.

Now, who the hell are you and who's Chris Stevens?
Rick
2006-09-02 18:01:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter L
Post by Mike
Post by Peter L
Who the hell are you?
You're new here. Welcome :-))
Thank you.
Now, who the hell are you and who's Chris Stevens?
Mike Crowe is a venomous OAP from the IOW, who delights in winding others up
on here!


k
Mike
2006-09-02 18:11:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rick
Post by Peter L
Post by Mike
Post by Peter L
Who the hell are you?
You're new here. Welcome :-))
Thank you.
Now, who the hell are you and who's Chris Stevens?
Mike Crowe is a venomous OAP from the IOW, who delights in winding others up
on here!
k
Thank you Chris :-)) I knew I could rely on you to respond :-))

Peter that explains all. 'Rick' is Chris Stevens who couldn't tell the truth
if it hit him/her in the face.

him/her? Not quite sure of him/herself so dresses in woman's clothing :-((
Not all of the time, but has been known to try to ride a motor bike in a
dress and got it caught in the back wheel and threw him/her off, so tis
said, but I regret I am unable to vouch the truth there and as I don't tell
lies, I have to cover myself :-)) You could ask Chris, but under no
circumstances could you rely on the answer :-((

Mike
The truth will prevail

:-))
Rick
2006-09-02 18:16:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mike
Post by Rick
Post by Peter L
Post by Mike
Post by Peter L
Who the hell are you?
You're new here. Welcome :-))
Thank you.
Now, who the hell are you and who's Chris Stevens?
Mike Crowe is a venomous OAP from the IOW, who delights in winding others
up
Post by Rick
on here!
k
Thank you Chris :-)) I knew I could rely on you to respond :-))
Peter that explains all. 'Rick' is Chris Stevens who couldn't tell the truth
if it hit him/her in the face.
him/her? Not quite sure of him/herself so dresses in woman's clothing :-((
Not all of the time, but has been known to try to ride a motor bike in a
dress and got it caught in the back wheel and threw him/her off, so tis
said, but I regret I am unable to vouch the truth there and as I don't tell
lies, I have to cover myself :-)) You could ask Chris, but under no
circumstances could you rely on the answer :-((
Mike
The truth will prevail
:-))
Interesting points coming from someone who feels the truth will prevail!

But then again someone who wrongully accuses others of being child
molestors, without a scrap of evidence to support their accusations, would
seem to have a very tenuous relationship with telling the truth!

k
s***@hotmail.co.uk
2006-09-02 18:33:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rick
But then again someone who wrongully accuses others of being child
molestors, without a scrap of evidence to support their accusations, would
seem to have a very tenuous relationship with telling the truth!
And yet you do this constantly. From your own mouth you are convicted
time and time again.
Rick
2006-09-02 20:27:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by s***@hotmail.co.uk
Post by Rick
But then again someone who wrongully accuses others of being child
molestors, without a scrap of evidence to support their accusations, would
seem to have a very tenuous relationship with telling the truth!
And yet you do this constantly. From your own mouth you are convicted
time and time again.
I accuse no one without good reason!

k
s***@hotmail.co.uk
2006-09-03 08:06:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rick
I accuse no one without good reason!
That is a lie
Rick
2006-09-03 10:31:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by s***@hotmail.co.uk
Post by Rick
I accuse no one without good reason!
That is a lie
Coming from a totally anonymous sock who likes to abuse kiddies, thats quite
a statement.................lol

k
s***@hotmail.co.uk
2006-09-03 11:26:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rick
Coming from a totally anonymous sock who likes to abuse kiddies, thats quite
a statement.................lol
It is the truth, unlike anything that you post. Your continuing lies
are noted, along with your hypocrisy. Your appalling behaviour is
known to all.
Rick
2006-09-03 11:54:08 UTC
Permalink
Post by s***@hotmail.co.uk
Post by Rick
Coming from a totally anonymous sock who likes to abuse kiddies, thats quite
a statement.................lol
It is the truth, unlike anything that you post. Your continuing lies
are noted, along with your hypocrisy. Your appalling behaviour is
known to all.
Shame the court didnt seem to feel my behaviour was a matter for
consideration...................cost your pervert m8
£38k..................lol

k
s***@hotmail.co.uk
2006-09-03 12:00:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rick
Shame the court didnt seem to feel my behaviour was a matter for
consideration...................cost your pervert m8
£38k..................lol
There is not one single fact in this post that is not a lie.
Blackthorn
2006-09-03 12:13:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by s***@hotmail.co.uk
There is not one single fact in this post that is not a lie.
How can facts be lies?
s***@hotmail.co.uk
2006-09-03 12:32:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Blackthorn
How can facts be lies?
Only in Chris Steven's head!
Rick
2006-09-03 14:37:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by s***@hotmail.co.uk
Post by Blackthorn
How can facts be lies?
Only in Chris Steven's head!
1) The perv gets a hard on looking at 13 yr olds (verified by himself
through a post on here

2) After his claims against the ISPs were dismissed there was a liability
order against the perv made for some £38k (according to ISP solicitor this
remains unpaid).

That simple enough for you nonce boy?

k.
Mike
2006-09-03 14:45:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rick
2) After his claims against the ISPs were dismissed there was a liability
order against the perv made for some £38k (according to ISP solicitor this
remains unpaid).
????
Chris, you have been claiming that this £38k is due to YOU taking some part
in it. NOW you are admitting that it was due to the case against the ISPs

Had you not been there, the ISPs case would still be there and has nothing
to do with you.

Another Chris Stevens lie?

I think so :-))

Mike
The truth will prevail :-))
--
--------------------------------------
Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association
www.rnshipmates.co.uk
www.nsrafa.com
Rick
2006-09-03 19:28:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mike
Post by Rick
2) After his claims against the ISPs were dismissed there was a liability
order against the perv made for some £38k (according to ISP solicitor this
remains unpaid).
????
Chris, you have been claiming that this £38k is due to YOU taking some part
in it. NOW you are admitting that it was due to the case against the ISPs
Had you not been there, the ISPs case would still be there and has nothing
to do with you.
Another Chris Stevens lie?
I think so :-))
Mike
The truth will prevail :-))
--
--------------------------------------
Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association
www.rnshipmates.co.uk
www.nsrafa.com
If the cunt hadnt been trolled on here in the first place, there would never
have been a case!..............Is senile dementia setting in I wonder?

k
s***@hotmail.co.uk
2006-09-03 19:36:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rick
If the cunt hadnt been trolled on here in the first place, there would never
have been a case!..............Is senile dementia setting in I wonder?
So you admit your appalling behaviour.
s***@hotmail.co.uk
2006-09-03 19:33:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rick
1) The perv gets a hard on looking at 13 yr olds (verified by himself
through a post on here
2) After his claims against the ISPs were dismissed there was a liability
order against the perv made for some £38k (according to ISP solicitor this
remains unpaid).
That simple enough for you nonce boy?
The 38K Bunt owes is nothing to do with you - your lied that it was.
Lie. Is Bunt a perv? I've no idea and less interest. If you're saying
he is, then that's probably a lie as that's all you do.

Simple enough for you, Liar?
Rick
2006-09-03 20:18:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rick
1) The perv gets a hard on looking at 13 yr olds (verified by himself
through a post on here
2) After his claims against the ISPs were dismissed there was a liability
order against the perv made for some £38k (according to ISP solicitor this
remains unpaid).
That simple enough for you nonce boy?
The 38K Bunt owes is nothing to do with you - your lied that it was.
Lie. Is Bunt a perv? I've no idea and less interest. If you're saying
he is, then that's probably a lie as that's all you do.

Simple enough for you, Liar?


After being trolled on here baldrick bunt came up with a cunning plan to
defruad ISPs of £100k..........which sadly for him failed miserably, and
cost him £38k legal costsa!

If the twat hadnt been trolled in the first place, there would have been no
cunning plan, no court case, and no need for the prick to pay
£38k...............get it, or is that a bit too complex for you?

k
s***@hotmail.co.uk
2006-09-04 07:33:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rick
If the twat hadnt been trolled in the first place, there would have been no
cunning plan, no court case, and no need for the prick to pay
£38k...............get it, or is that a bit too complex for you?
Its as complex as your pointed brain and fits your usual logical steps,
to whit, adding 2 and 2 and making 20. So, the 38K has nothing to do
with you. Nothing very complex about that.

Now speaking of owing large sums, I gather your hatred of solicitors
and courts might have something to do with the sums that you owe. How
very interesting.
Mike
2006-09-04 07:38:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rick
If the twat hadnt been trolled in the first place, there would have been no
cunning plan, no court case, and no need for the prick to pay
£38k...............get it, or is that a bit too complex for you?
Its as complex as your pointed brain and fits your usual logical steps,
to whit, adding 2 and 2 and making 20. So, the 38K has nothing to do
with you. Nothing very complex about that.

Now speaking of owing large sums, I gather your hatred of solicitors
and courts might have something to do with the sums that you owe. How
very interesting.
...................................

How VERY intersting, please enlighten us :-))

After all the talk of £38k someone else owes, HE/SHE owes a mountain?

Mike
--
--------------------------------------
Royal Naval Electrical Branch Association
www.rnshipmates.co.uk
www.nsrafa.com
Alan Holmes
2006-09-03 22:21:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rick
Post by Peter L
Post by Mike
Post by Peter L
Who the hell are you?
You're new here. Welcome :-))
Thank you.
Now, who the hell are you and who's Chris Stevens?
Mike Crowe is a venomous OAP from the IOW, who delights in winding others
up on here!
k
So Mike Crowe is Chris Stevens?
Alan Holmes
2006-09-03 22:20:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter L
Post by Mike
Post by Peter L
Who the hell are you?
You're new here. Welcome :-))
Thank you.
Now, who the hell are you and who's Chris Stevens?
I wanted to say that!
Alan Holmes
2006-09-03 22:19:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter L
who is at present posting as everybody except him/herself, listens too much
to Harvey and not enough to ed.
Consequently, he/she is showing him/herself up to all and sundry :-))
Keep it up Chris, we love it :-))
Mike
The truth will prevail
'Truth'? Not a word Chris is familiar with :-(((((
(Question. Is it Christopher or Christine? I suppose it depends on whether
you are in Y Fronts or Bra and Thong)
Who the hell are you?
And who the hell are you?
Loading...